Socialist Cult Of Mass Murder Gleeful Over Right To Kill Babies... And The "Media" That Loves It...

Mollie @ Patheos, GetReligion nails it, regarding the media coverage of the abortion fight in Texas:

"...unless the Associated Press is coming out as partisans in this debate, this is inappropriate bias for a hotly-contested story about a bill sponsored by … a female Texan who has talked about this legislation in the context of how it benefits women as well as the children growing in their wombs. Again, one might personally agree with one side or the other, but the story should not take sides. 

"...Now, given that abortion is legal in all 50 states and that under the Roe regime, that we only last month witnessed the conviction of an abortion doctor for infanticide and murder (among other things) and that despite lax coverage we see reports of clinic failures throughout the country with alarming frequency, I wonder if the story should mention any of this...Would you like to guess which paragraph of this 16-paragraph story got around to mentioning Kermit Gosnell or any of these things or the context under which this legislation is being considered?...Did you guess that the folks writing the story never got around to it? You would be correct!..."

Of course, you would.  Read more HERE.... and HERE... 

NSA Leak Story Writer, Glenn Greenwald Calls Socialist/Liberal Media "Servants Of Political Power Rather than Watchdogs Over it..."

Glenn Greenwald  (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Why did Reporter Glenn Greenwald say this about the Socialist Liberal Media (SLIME)?...

"...they are far more servants to political power than adversarial watchdogs over it, and what provokes their rage most is not corruption on the part of those in power (they don’t care about that) but rather those who expose that corruption, especially when the ones bringing transparency are outside of, even hostile to, their incestuous media circles..."

Greenwald was responding to Meet The Press Host, David Gregory, who asked him:

"...To the extent that you have aided and abetted Snowden, [the NSA Leaker] even in his current movements, why shouldn’t you, Mr. Greenwald, be charged with a crime?...”

Andrew Ross Sorkin @ CNBC said on CNBC's "Squakbox," that in addition to apprehending NSA leaker, Edward Snowden, he'd almost arrest Glenn Greenwald too (for releasing the story).  According to Matt Wilstein at Mediaite:

“...I would arrest him,” Sorkin continued, referring to Snowden, “and now I would almost arrest Glenn Greenwald, who’s the journalist who seems to want to help him get to Ecuador.”

Greenwald told Eric Wemple (Washington Post) that the media were:

"...just courtiers doing what courtiers have always done: defending the royal court and attacking anyone who challenges or dissents from it. That’s how they maintain their status and access within it. That’s what courtiers to power, by definition, do..."

Interestingly Sorkin responded to Greenwald on Twitter, apparently backing off from his statement, stating:

"...just to be 100% clear: i am not saying you or any journalists should be arrested. i'm FOR transparency. i was raising other q's..."

But a transcript quote by the Eric Wemple Blog clearly shows what Sorkin originally proposed was quoted correctly.

And here's the video with the question by Gregory, which Greenwald answered so eloquently:

Click HERE for more Red Clix Blitz HEADLINERS...

SLIME Ignores Tea Party Rallies...

It seems the Socialist Liberal Media (SLIME) was ticked off enough at the Obama administration Justice Department for spying on reporters, amd so they dutifully penned a barrage of news stories about the infraction, but they were not outraged enough to  cover Tea Party rallies against the IRS targeting of Conservatives.

Such is Life.  Apparently the Attorney General's peccadilloes against a complicit press is cause for  a mere spat, and the SLIME continues in bed with the Socialist Regime.

Matthew Balan says the SLIME even minimized the coverage of the story about the $70 Million in bonuses the IRS just gave its employees.  Yes, that's right.  Some of the wealth they confiscated from you is being redistributed to themselves.  Fair is fair, isn't it?

Here's more about that from Matthew Balan...